Supreme Court of Ukraine

NABU has completed the investigation of the case against ex-minister Solsky regarding the seizure of 2,499 hectares of land worth UAH 280 million. the lawyer claims that there is no evidence, and expert examinations refute the version of the investigation.

According to Nina Yuzhanina, in October, the state tax service blocked invoices of 23. 8 thousand taxpayers in the amount of UAH 44 billion. more than 70% of blockages turned out to be false after verification by commissions and courts.

The Supreme Court has denied charges of "leaking" documents in the Concord case.

The Commercial Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeals of Kolomoisky and Triantal Investments Ltd regarding the return of PrivatBank. The decision is final and confirms the legality of the 2016 nationalization.

The co-founder of Concord Bank, Olena Sosiedka, thanked journalist Plinsky for his support in the fight for justice. The journalist appealed to the Supreme Court to impartially consider the bank's cassation appeal.

The NABU has launched an inspection of the UAH 17. 7 million apartment where Minister of Agrarian Policy Vitaliy Koval lives. This is the third agriculture minister to be investigated by the anti-corruption bureau.

NABU Senior Detective Viktor Yarema expressed doubts about the authenticity of the 1953 document in the case against former Minister Solsky. The document on which the investigation relies is only a copy with handwritten changes and does not have an original in any government agency.

A Kharkiv-based human rights group has reported regular violations of the presumption of innocence in high-profile cases by the NABU. The bureau's detectives pass information to activists in almost all investigations.

A key document was “lost” in the NABU case against former Minister Solskyi.

Journalist Volodymyr Boyko accused Vitaliy Shabunin of obtaining the status of a combatant without actually serving.

The HACC extended the measure of restraint for former Minister Solskyi until December 8. SAPO prosecutors admitted that there was no evidence of guilt in the 5-year investigation of the ATO land case.

The National Bank of Ukraine has been at the center of a series of scandals due to the actions of its officials. Despite the criminal proceedings that have been opened, the NBU's management ignores public attention and does not respond to violations by its subordinates, which undermines confidence in the country's banking system.

The Administrative Court of Cassation upheld the NACP's decision to terminate state funding of the Golos party. The reason was inaccurate information in the reports amounting to almost UAH 5 million for 2020.

From 2013 to 2023, the number of working judges in Ukraine decreased by 41. 2%. As of October this year, there were 4,988 judges in the country. Currently, the staff shortage is 29.6%.

Oleksandr Kolotilin called the NABU case against him and Mykola Solskyi regarding land seizure absurd. He claims that the plots are with the owners and have not been arrested, considering the case to be political.

Leonid Loboyko, a judge of the Supreme Court in the Criminal Court of Cassation, was killed by an enemy drone attack. The tragedy occurred on September 28, 2024, in the village of Kozacha Lopan, Kharkiv region.

A civilian car was attacked by an enemy drone in Kozacha Lopan, Kharkiv region. A 61-year-old Supreme Court judge delivering humanitarian aid was killed, and three women were injured.

CEO Club analysts have found that the State Tax Service blocks tax invoices of honest businesses to fill the budget. This allows the state to receive an “interest-free loan” from entrepreneurs without their consent.

The Supreme Court has confirmed the illegality of the Kyiv City Council's decision to allocate land for a shopping center near Lake Vyrlytsia. The 20-hectare plot worth over UAH 1 billion was returned to municipal ownership.

NABU detectives “secretly” interrogated more than a thousand ATO soldiers.

ATO soldiers denied NABU's accusations against former Minister Solsky. They claim that they received land plots without conditions and are free to dispose of them.

ATO veterans and the military expressed outrage at the NABU's intentions to interrogate them in the case against former Minister Solsky. They emphasize that during the war there are more important matters than seizing land from the country's defenders.

Former deputy head of the Prosecutor General's Office Andriy Smirnov said that NABU detectives and SAPO prosecutors had purchased luxury assets at low prices by registering them in their relatives' names. He also criticized the NABU report and called the heads of the anti-corruption agencies 'random'.

The NABU intends to question more than a thousand ATO soldiers in the case of ex-Minister Solsky, despite their participation in the fighting. Expert examinations and court rulings cast doubt on the validity of NABU's suspicions of illegal land acquisition.

The Northern Commercial Court of Appeal has overturned the order of the Ministry of Justice to protect the property of the museum in Pyrohiv from raider seizure. The Ministry of Culture claims that this effectively legalizes the raider seizure of part of the museum's territory and premises.

The state-owned enterprises of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences, which initiated the case against former Minister Solsky, have lost almost half of their land since independence. This has greatly complicated the NABU's investigation, as it is difficult to establish who owns the land.

The High Anti-Corruption Court has allowed the lawyers of former Minister Solskyi to seize NABU materials. This decision is based on information that NABU has data from another case that could confirm the ex-minister's innocence.

The High Council of Justice has dismissed Vsevolod Kniazev, a judge of the Administrative Court of Cassation within the Supreme Court. The decision was made on August 6, 2024, on the grounds of committing a significant disciplinary offense.

The High Anti-Corruption Court has removed the electronic bracelet from the defendant in the case of former Minister Solsky. The Supreme Court's examination and decision show that the accused land did not belong to the National Academy of Sciences, which casts doubt on NABU's accusations.

Scientific and legal expertise has established that the land that NABU considers to be the property of the National Academy of Sciences has never belonged to it. This confirms the position of the defense of former Minister Solsky in the case of alleged illegal privatization.