HACCU removes electronic bracelet from another defendant in the case of former Minister of Agrarian Policy Solsky
Kyiv • UNN
The High Anti-Corruption Court has removed the electronic bracelet from the defendant in the case of former Minister Solsky. The Supreme Court's examination and decision show that the accused land did not belong to the National Academy of Sciences, which casts doubt on NABU's accusations.
The High Anti-Corruption Court has removed an electronic bracelet from another defendant in the case against former Minister of Agrarian Policy Mykola Solsky, UNN reports.
This decision was made by the HACC on July 30. The investigating judge partially granted the defense's motion and canceled the obligation to "wear an electronic monitoring device." The court left the rest of the duties imposed on the suspect unchanged.
Add
The HACC also removed the electronic bracelet from Mykola Solskiy in mid-May.
According to anti-corruption activists, eight years ago, Solsky (when he was a lawyer) organized a scheme whereby NAAS land was transferred for privatization to ATO soldiers. The defense and the ATO soldiers themselves argue that the privatized land never belonged to the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences, and therefore the NABU's claims are null and void, and the privatization procedure is legal.
To establish the truth, NABU needs to prove that the land in question really belonged to the National Academy of Sciences. However, the score is still 0:2 in favor of Solsky. The first significant factor was the decision of the Supreme Court of Ukraine - the judges found that the land incriminated to Solsky had never really belonged to the NAAS.
Moreover, this was confirmed by a scientific and legal expert opinion. The expert opinion showed that Solskyi and other NABU suspects could not have taken possession of the land of the National Agrarian Academy, as this land did not belong to the NAAS.
Thus, the main intrigue of the whole case is whether the detectives will be able to prove that the land belonged to the National Academy of Sciences. After all, if NABU does not prove this fact, the case will most likely fall apart. This may be evidenced by the fact that the detectives tried to "leak" the examinationthat they themselves had ordered, and which was obviously supposed to testify to Solsky's innocence.
