Supreme Court denies charges of "leaking" documents in Concord case

Supreme Court denies charges of "leaking" documents in Concord case

Kyiv  •  UNN

 • 10307 views

The Supreme Court has denied charges of "leaking" documents in the Concord case.

The Supreme Court rejected charges of allegedly illegally distributing materials in the case of Concord bank, which is in the process of liquidation. We were told that all materials on this case are available to the participants of the case through the electronic court program, writes UNN.

Context

Earlier, co-founder of Concord bank Elena Sosedka thanked journalist Yevgeny Pulinsky for publicly participating in the struggle to restore justice in the situation with Concord. In particular, she said that the journalist appealed to the Supreme Court with a corresponding request regarding the consideration of the Concord case. However, in response, the journalist hinted that this request was "leaked" to Elena Sosedka by court employees. This information was picked up by several publications and Telegram channels.

"Media resources spread information about the alleged illegal distribution by employees of the Supreme Court ("draining") of documents obtained during the performance of official duties. In particular, it is indicated that the journalist's Information request sent to the Supreme Court regarding the consideration of the cassation appeal in the case against the bank allegedly somehow got to one of the bank's owners.

In this regard, we would like to inform you that all documents submitted to the Supreme Court within a specific case are immediately registered using the court's automated document management system and automatically sent to the electronic offices of the participants in the case. This option is included in the functionality of the "electronic court", - noted in the Supreme Court.

They noted that the court employees did not carry out illegal distribution of documents obtained in the performance of their official duties, but acted in accordance with the requirements of the procedural legislation.

Recall

Earlier it became known that Concord shareholders appealed in court the decision of the National Bank of Ukraine to withdraw the bank from the market. The courts of first and appellate instances declared illegal and overturned the decision of the NBU to revoke the license and liquidate Concord bank. However, the Ukrainian legislation is written out in such a way that the process of withdrawing a banking institution from the market, if it is launched, is irrevocable. 

Despite the war in Ukraine, the process of withdrawing banks from the market has not stopped. So, since February 24, 2022, liquidation was Started in relation to 8 banks. In 2023, for the first time in Ukraine, not only bankrupt banks, but also profitable institutions were liquidated and revoked-We are talking about Concord bank. as stated by Elena Sosedka, at the time of the regulator's announcement of the decision to liquidate the bank, there were enough highly liquid assets in the financial institution to make all the necessary payments in 2-3 weeks. But the bank's liquidation process is strictly regulated by law and can generally last up to three years.