Weapons provided by the US should be used within Ukrainian territory - Pentagon

 • 29214 переглядiв

The Pentagon reiterates that weapons provided by the United States to Ukraine must be used on Ukrainian territory.

The Pentagon believes that the weapons provided by the United States to Ukraine should be used within Ukrainian territory. This was stated by Deputy Spokesperson for the US Department of Defense Sabrina Singh during a briefing on May 16, UNN reports.

Yes, we haven't changed our position. We believe that the equipment, the capabilities that we are giving Ukraine, that other countries are giving to Ukraine should be used to take back Ukrainian sovereign territory

Singh answered the question whether the United States plans to change its approach after Russia's attack on the Kharkiv region.

When asked whether this is a request to the Ukrainian side or a prerequisite, the Pentagon deputy spokeswoman said that the US requests in this regard are quite public.

"We've made our requests pretty public on this. Again, I would reiterate that, in every single Ukraine defense contact group that the Secretary convenes, the weapons that are provided, again, it's for use on the battlefield. And the Secretary, in his conversations with Minister Umerov, talks through how best those capabilities can be used, and we believe that is within Ukrainian territory," Singh added.

Addendum

At the same time, during his visit to Kyiv, U.S. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken said that the United States "does not encourage" strikes with American weapons outside of Ukraine, but that Ukraine "must make its own decision" on how it is going to fight this war.

The same position was reiterated at a briefing on Thursday, May 16, by Deputy Spokesperson for the US State Department Vedant Patel.

"So certainly not a policy change. Our policy has not changed, and the Secretary was clear about this. We do not encourage or enable strikes on Russian territory, but repeatedly we’ve also said that Ukraine ultimately makes its own decisions about its military strikes and its operations, and that continues to be the case," Patel said.

In turn, analysts and experts with whom Voice of America spoke believe that a new Russian offensive and constant shelling of Kharkiv may persuade America to reconsider its position.

"This restriction is one of the reasons why Kharkiv is suffering so much. If Ukraine could strike at Russian troops that are right across the border, Russia would have had much greater logistical problems before launching this offensive. If we had allowed Ukraine to shoot at Russian planes that are in Russian airspace and launching cruise bombs that kill people, fewer people would have died in Kharkiv," commented former US Ambassador to Ukraine John Herbst.

Popular
Top 4 melodramas with a tearful ending that everyone should watch

 • 11343 переглядiв

Posthumous donor: Ohmatdyt held a corridor of honor for 13-year-old Ivan

 • 16076 переглядiв

Crimea ablaze: Tavriiska TPP under attack - media

 • 18216 переглядiв

Britain allowed the US to use its bases for strikes on Iran

 • 8992 переглядiв

News by theme
Weapons provided by the US should be used within Ukrainian territory - Pentagon

 • 29214 переглядiв

Russia claims to have attacked more than 100 drones at night: what is known

 • 26465 переглядiв

Enemy army attacks Dnipropetrovs'k region with drones: houses and a car damaged

 • 25467 переглядiв

Air defense shoots down all 20 Shahed-131/136 attack drones

 • 27134 переглядiв

russia is suffering losses: 1410 soldiers killed in 24 hours

 • 23223 переглядiв

Enemy made 438 attacks in Zaporizhzhya region, shelling 6 localities

 • 23316 переглядiв

Air defense against enemy UAVs intensified in Dnipropetrovs'k region

 • 22393 переглядiв

TikTok is testing the ability to upload 60-minute videos

 • 21528 переглядiв