After a prolonged pause, the court resumed consideration of the case concerning medical negligence by Odrex doctors

 • 21926 переглядiв

Despite a series of postponements, the Kyivskyi District Court of Odesa continued hearing the case concerning medical negligence by Odrex doctors Vitalii Rusakov and Maryna Bielotserkovska.

After a lengthy series of postponements, the Kyivskyi District Court of Odesa finally managed to make progress in the criminal case concerning the medical negligence of doctors at the private Odrex clinic, Vitalii Rusakov and Maryna Bielotserkovska. As sources told UNN, two of the three scheduled hearings took place. Another hearing had to be postponed for technical reasons.

The active consideration of the case last week was rather an exception against the backdrop of how the proceedings had unfolded in recent months. The criminal case has been ongoing for almost ten months, yet a significant number of the scheduled hearings have not taken place. This was due to repeated postponements caused by the participation of the accused doctors’ lawyers in other court proceedings, motions to recuse the judge, and a change of jurisdiction.

Three years until the case is closed: how the statute of limitations may affect the trial in the Odrex doctors’ case25.08.26, 10:28

Vitalii Rusakov and Maryna Bielotserkovska are accused of improperly performing their professional duties, which, according to the investigation, may have caused the death of businessman Adnan Kivan. The court must determine whether the doctors complied with standards for providing medical care and whether there is a causal link between their actions (or inaction) and the patient’s death.

However, the path to examining the key medical evidence proved protracted. As a result, presiding Judge Viktor Chaplytskyi deemed the reasons for the regular absence of the accused doctors’ lawyers unjustified and appealed to the Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar.

Will the delay in the Odrex case have consequences for the lawyers?16.09.26, 09:01

Subsequently, Rusakov’s defense filed a motion to recuse the presiding judge for the third time. The court denied the motion, but it was also impossible to proceed with the further consideration of the case that day because the accused himself failed to appear.

Let us recall

In recent months, the case has been heard behind closed doors due to the need to protect medical confidentiality and the deceased patient’s medical data. The court is examining and quoting medical records, information about the patient’s health, the course of treatment, and other information whose access is restricted by law.

What a forensic medical expert evaluates in medical negligence cases - a blitz interview with Professor Andrii Bilyakov19.05.26, 15:58

Yevhen Tsarenko Slider
Popular
News by theme
F1 2026 Azerbaijan Grand Prix: the race in Baku

 • 5199 переглядiв

The HACC ordered the NBU to investigate the blocking of bail payments for Iryna Mudra

 • 5644 переглядiв

Volkswagen to recall nearly 4 million vehicles

 • 3501 переглядiв

Taylor Swift released Encore for her hit album Showgirl

 • 30485 переглядiв

A Fuel Reserve Without Risk - How, Where, and in What to Store Gasoline and Diesel Properly

 • 107700 переглядiв

Top 10 film premieres coming out this week

 • 3034 переглядiв