Mykhailo Podolyak, advisor to the head of the Presidential Office, commented on putin's accusations that Ukraine was allegedly involved in the terrorist attack in moscow. According to UNN, Podolyak said that putin's statement was inadequate and the allegations were meaningless.
Details
Podolyak believes that the facts about the perpetrators of the terrorist attack in the moscow region and the failed incompetence of the russian special services are indisputable.
But the "putin entity" is once again entering the public space with inadequate statements. He continues to accuse the victim of being attacked in 2014 and annexing their own territories, in the face of devastating terrorist missile attacks on Ukrainian citizens. And at the same time, he claims in the most ridiculous way that they attacked "russia" and that "the terrorist attack by ISIS radicals is a continuation of this attack."
He asked a rhetorical question that he did not answer.
Once again, I will ask a rhetorical question that does not make sense even in this form: why are there still politicians who consider Putin capable, adequate, worthy of attention, and capable of any negotiations/agreements? What other nonsense does he have to say to make people stop paying attention to his statements?
Recall
Ukraine categorically rejects russia's accusations of its alleged involvement in the shooting at a concert hall in krasnogorsk, calling it a kremlin provocation aimed at stirring up anti-Ukrainian hysteria and discrediting Ukraine.
White House on the Crocus attack: no connection to Ukraine, it's Kremlin propaganda25.03.24, 21:30